The Buzz

WILL GOP BAIL ON ROMNEY?

By Scott I. Williams

Communications Director, 5^th District Democrats

The old man from Kansas is still mad about it. Bob Dole is still angry that his Republican party abandoned him in 1996, when it opted to save its control of Congress and let Bill Clinton take the election.

That was almost two decades ago. However, what happened then – party elders bailed on Dole and opted to put money where they felt it was best spent – could happen today. It’s simple economics. Don’t put your money behind a loser.

As Republicans find themselves faced with the increasingly unpopular option of backing Mitt Romney – a candidate that many people flat out dislike – they also will be looking at an even tougher choice. Should they give in to fate and admit that they do not have a candidate who can beat Barak Obama? Should they, instead, throw their effort into making sure they hold the House, and, perhaps, win the Senate?

It’s not a new strategy for Republicans. They did it in 1964, too, when they deserted Barry Goldwater in the face of overwhelming odds.

Already, some Republican stalwarts are bailing out. Michael Steele, former Republican Party chair, admitted on MSNBC as Super Tuesday results were rolling in, “They are just not buying what Romney has been selling.”

That quintessential Republican columnist, George Will of the Washington Post, writes: “[T]here would come a point when … conservatives turn their energies to a goal much more attainable than … electing Romney or Santorum president. It is the goal of retaining control of the House and winning control of the Senate… [C]onservatives this year should have as their primary goal making sure Republicans wield all the gavels in Congress in 2013,” according to Politico .

Sure, there is still a race going on. Rick Santorum thinks he can win, against the odds. So do, apparently, Newt Gingrich and Ron Paul. No one ever said Republicans were good at facing reality.

Talk is fading that Mitch Daniels or Chris Christie or Jeb Bush (or Sarah Palin!?!) might come in as a white knight to save Republicans’ hopes for the White House.

Sure, I am future-tripping a bit, here. The Republican establishment might all jump on the Romney bandwagon and he’ll sail through the remaining primaries to nomination, without a brokered convention. Yeah, and the earth will turn backwards tomorrow.

Let’s look at the Romney-Dole comparison a little more closely. It was 1996 (a leap year). Hamas and Israel were fighting. The Greek government was in turmoil. Osama Bin Laden declares jihad on Americans in Saudi Arabia. A whole boatload of Republicans squabbled over their presidential candidacy. At one point or another, Dole, Steve Forbes, Richard Lugar, Phil Gramm and Lamar Alexander, Alan Keyes, Bob Dornan, Pete Wilson, Arlen Specter, Colin Powell, Dick Cheney, Don Rumsfeld, Morry Taylor and Pat Buchanan were among early presidential possibilities.

Dole won the free-for-all and wound up trying to unseat Clinton, a hugely popular president. Dole had plenty of experience in the federal government – something Romney does not have. And he got crushed by Clinton, 49 percent to 41 percent.

So how is Romney supposed to fare any better? He just got crunched in the Deep South. If Romney can outspend his main opponent 10-to-1 in Ohio and still only beat Santorum by a hair, if Romney can only win the most important state on Super Tuesday by a slim margin, how can he possibly beat a sitting president who is winning in the polls without even launching a serious campaign?

The answer is simple: He can’t. Even this far into the primaries, Republicans are looking for an alternative. Why? Because Mitt Romney is a loser. He has no pizzazz, no soul. He campaigns like a web mop, yesterday’s leftover mashed potatoes.

Already, Romney and the party have alienated women, Hispanics and many Independents. After Super Tuesday, add to that the fact that the blue-collar vote, conservatives and evangelical Christians are torn. The vote in the Deep South for Santorum only reinforced that trend.

Republicans are only agreed on one thing: Their main guy cannot win. To expect the big Republican money to keep supporting him all the way to the November is flying in the face of history.

See: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0312/73541.html , http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0312/73541.html,

 http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0312/73716.html#ixzz1oSfguUqz

WASHINGTON: A KEY GOP CAUCUS STATE?

By Scott I. Williams

Communications Director, 5^th District Democrats

As Democrats sit back and watch Republicans slug it out for their Presidential nomination, one question hangs in the air in this state’s political circles: Will Washington matter?

The results of the Democratic caucuses in April are a given. President Obama will be our nominee. The only question will be how many people show up at their local caucus to rubber stamp the decision. And Obama remains well ahead of each of the Republican candidates in the polls (see Real Clear Politics’ summary of leading polls: www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_election_romney_vs_obama-1171.html ).

But the Republican story is different. The GOP free-for-all that started in Iowa and continued into Saturday’s Maine caucuses suggests that, come March 3, political junkies of both parties across the country could be watching Washington closely. They will be wondering: What will the GOP Washington caucuses reveal? Do Republicans dislike (or distrust) Mitt “Wet Mop” Romney enough to put someone else on top, even before their August national convention?

Democrats will be watching, knowing that political in-fighting among Republicans does nothing but help Obama. Besides, it is good theater. Cheap entertainment.

The results of Republican blood-letting so far suggest enough questions will remain about GOP party leadership that this state’s results could make a difference. Yeah, Romney won Maine on Saturday, adding to his growing delegate count. But he did not dominate, like a shoe-in candidate should. He beat Ron Paul by less than 200 votes.

His ability to win is still in doubt. Remember just last week, when Rick Santorum swept three states? Recall Newt Gingrich’s landslide in South Carolina? And Paul just won’t fade away, much to GOP leadership’s chagrin.

The Washington caucuses will be held three days before what is probably the most important day in the primary season: Super Tuesday. On Tuesday, March 6, the GOP nominee will be chosen in 10 states. What happened in Washington three days earlier will be top-of-mind for voters when the nominee is selected in huge delegate states like Ohio, Tennessee and Virginia. Washington will be the first read of voter sentiment on the West Coast.

“The Washington result may be the last bit of momentum that can be generated for a candidate before Super Tuesday,” Larry Sabato, director of the University of Virginia’s Center for Politics, told The Seattle Times.

Republican Chairman Kirby Wilbur agrees: “Given the nature of the race so far, I think we’re going to be more important than we have been in years, if not decades.”

DELEGATES ON THE LINE

What’s more, there are 43 Washington delegates at stake in the Washington caucuses – the most between the Florida and Super Tuesday. While those delegates will not be formally bound to any candidate until June, this state represents a healthy chunk of the total 1,144 delegates needed. This is not a winner-take-all state, meaning candidates will have to fight for every delegate.

Certainly, the significance of Washington state in the process has not been missed by the candidates’ campaigns. Romney, with a bevy of endorsements from Republican leaders, has his machine running here, as does Paul. Gingrich’s people are raising money in this state and he has recruited an outspoken Bothell evangelical Christian, Pastor Joe Fuiten, in support. Santorum plans to visit and meet with Republican leaders and anti-gay-marriage activists this Monday – the same day Gov. Gregoire signs the same-sex marriage law.

Politics can be messy. Caucuses, in particular, can be the essence of democracy at work – its best and its worst. Caucuses are, as one Republican politician put it, “really personally interactive politics…neighbors sitting with neighbors, agreeing and disagreeing and trying to outmaneuver each other.”

So watch out for the Washington GOP caucus. As March 3 rolls around, while Democrats watch from the sidelines, the Republicans will probably show us once again how really messy it can get.

By Scott Williams

Communicatons Director, 5th District Democrats

For months, political headlines across the country have told the same story: Republicans are fighting among themselves to find a strong leader. As their third primary nears, it looks like they have decided on former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney – a party player without an ounce of charisma whose main attribute is the ability to shift positions to fit the moment.

Meanwhile, President Obama is gearing up for the 2012 elections. He’s beginning to try out his best political hat – his ability to stir up crowds and mount a strong campaign. While there’s lots of time before next November, here’s my take on the reasons why Democrats will win the election:

1/ MISFIT MITT: The Republican Party does not have a viable candidate to go up against Barak Obama in 2012. Are Newt (“The Brute”) Gingrich and “Misfit” Mitt Romney really the best they can come up with? Even uberconservative columnist Ann Coulter has said the party will lose with Romney at the helm. And Gingrich? He’s your mean old uncle, the politician everyone loves to hate.

2/ LOOKING UP: Economy is slowly, but surely, turning around. The key economic metric – unemployment – has turned down. Many observers would agree that the Obama Administration’s early efforts to halt the recession’s downward spiral by throwing $700 billion at the problem were feeble at best. Recall, however, that that figure was as much as Congress permitted. It stopped the hemorrhaging, at least.

3/ WHO’S ON FIRST? It’s all about image. Which party looks Presidential? For months, the Republican Party image is one of a car-full of clowns, each taking a turn on the roof before falling off. Political image-making during a Presidential campaign is a delicate affair. There’s nothing an out-of-power party needs less than a comedy act defining how voters perceive its ability to run the country.

4/ LOOKING GOOD: The American public is gradually realizing that the worst is over, and that Obama’s policies are, in fact, working. A year-end Associated Press poll showed that two thirds of Americans expect 2012 to be better than 2011. Optimism, particularly new optimism, works in the favor of an incumbent.

5/ THE PARTY’S OVER: The Tea Party, which by default has driven Republican Party policies since 2010, has lost much of its backbone after its devastating position on the payroll tax. The battle may have cost Republicans their leader in the House some serious political capital, and Tea Partiers across the country no longer have the clout the used to.

6/ BULLY PULPIT: Obama is finally stepping up. Emboldened by his victory in Congress on the payroll tax, the President is learning to use Teddy Roosevelt’s Bully Pulpit to accomplish Democratic goals.

7/ IT’S ALL ABOUT THE MONEY: Obama has already raised more than the eight remaining Republicans combined, according to the Federal Election Commission. And he really doesn’t need to spend much of it, yet. What will election coffers look like come August and September, when things really heat up?

8/ STYLE MATTERS: When the fighting gets tough on the campaign trail, who would you want on the podium leading your party? A dynamo like Obama or a wet mop like Romney? None of the Republicans can wow a crowd like Obama.

9/ SCANDALOUS: Sooner or later the conservative wing of the Republican Party, with its family-comes-first, neo-Puritan philosophy will realize that most of its leaders have violated these principles and have no stronger morals than anybody else.

10/ THE MESSAGE: The Republican Party in November will probably stick to its well-worn message, beaten into voters’ tired brains since 2010 election, that anything Obama does is bad. The problem is that, by then, the American electorate will have had enough of their tired old saw. They will be ready for change – away from the broken politics brought on by the right wing and back to the positive, realistic proposals made by Democrats.